Try Usersnap Now<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\nIn 2012 you started a blog called \u201cEnterprise is Sexy\u201d where you talk about your personal experiences and have guest posts about what it means to work in an enterprise. Why is enterprise sexy, and why do we need to talk about it?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Seven years ago, enterprise was not what it is today, not at all sexy. Everything was about the consumer, which I think is very complicated and competitive. Enterprise is as well, but it is much slower, and you have the chance to course correct sometimes. In a SaaS model, to die, you have to lose more customers than you gain each month. There’s time to course correct, because of MRR or ARR, and because people aren\u2019t quick to change in enterprise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You are such a key part of the San Francisco SaaS community. What challenges have you seen that SaaS companies are facing and how are they overcoming them?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
I think the persistent challenge is a vitamin versus a pain killer. In SaaS, your job is to figure out how to solve one problem and make it exponentially better. It can’t be even three times better, it has to be an order of magnitude better. The key to a successful software is its ability to change someone\u2019s behavior, how they get their job done. That is the challenge.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nNowadays, it\u2019s much easier than before to start a company. We’ve been in sort of the best of times where the money is flowing very freely and investors are willing to experiment and bet on a few things, especially in the early stage. I think those two things allow for a lot of vitamin building.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And now there are a lot more angels, you can raise $500,000 just on notes. You don\u2019t need an institutional investor, you don’t need to price the round. In SaaS, however, you need to have two years of money minimum, otherwise you’re most likely going to run out of money before you can show the traction that you need to raise more money. It’s a long journey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What do you think are some of the key factors to scale a SaaS business these days?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Jason’s theory is that up to the first million ARR, everyone gets there in their own way. For product founders, they’re leading with the product. Or you have a very sales or a very marketing-oriented sort of founder, and that founder, through whatever those skills are, will get you to the first million ARR. It’s just hand-to-hand combat for a very long time. And then after a million, every SaaS company at a given ACV roughly scales the same way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is all about getting to that traction<\/strong>, and understanding when you’re at that traction, which is only ever clear in hindsight. We just sit around going, “Are we there? I think we’re there. Maybe we’re not there.” You have no idea when it actually happens, but I think most founders just have it in their gut somewhere where they know it’s time to pour gasoline on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\nYou have been doing so many exciting things for the past 20 years of your career. What is your next project going to be?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
I want to do something that supports minorities and women, whether that’s a side project, or if that’s a more direct way at an intersection with software that helps solve a problem. I think it’s an interesting time to be a woman in tech. Certainly, in my 20-year career, this is the most interesting time. I think it’s, for better or worse, a great time to be a woman. I feel there’s this awareness, and there’s this focus on, “Oh, we need to be better about this.” For many years it’s been awful, and I would say that venture capital has far further to go than software companies and tech companies. But I think we’ll move past this idea of \u201cwomen and minorities\u201d to focus on inclusion, which is very important.<\/p>\n\n\n